Samwise Model Portfolios
The portfolios below are separated by launch dates. Each portfolio is entirely independent and has no bearing on any other model portfolio. We launch entirely new portfolios during each market correction as an illustrative tool for new subscribers who weren't present during...
Please login to view this page.

You mentioned yesterday that you may put on a Tesla trade today. What are you looking for today with TSLA and what is your short to intermediate term look on the stock?
Not quite yet. So with Tesla, we need to be really careful given how much it has run and how much it can easily retrace in terms of gains.
So with Tesla, we do need to see positive divergence. That means another leg down with lower lows but at a higher RSI. if we get that set-up, we’ll likely trade it long.
So far it’s rebounding, now we just need to see a retest of the lows and/or new lows.
Hey Sam,
I see you writing about gaps in the chart quite often. Can you talk on their importance for forecasting price action / trading behavior? Or if there is an Investing Basics article where you explain this could you link that to me?
Thanks!
So this would be under market technicals. We haven’t gotten there yet. It would be under “understanding the stock market.” You can read more about this on-line and/or ask ChatGBT about it. Here’s what it comes down to.
GAPs provide the most reliable support/resistance lines in the stock market. There’s a theory that suggests that all gaps eventually get filled — though that’s hardly true and when it does happen, it’s often due to a massive crash that just coincidentally fills gaps from years past.
But the general idea that the market tends to gravitate toward gaps is true. And if a gap fill is within distance, that’s where the market will gravitate.
A gap is created when a stock or index opens far above its previous closing price or opens far below its previous trading price. So for example, the QQQ closed yesterday at $510.23 and opened today at $513.35. The low today was $512.35. So there’s a $2.12 unfilled gap created by today’s sessions.
Gaps are generally disliked by the market as it means no trading activity at all occurred between those two price levels. The bigger the gap, the more likely it is to be filled.
There are multiple different types of gaps. There are runaway gaps, breakaway gaps, exhaustion gaps and common gaps like today.
Certain types of gaps are less likely to be filled. For example, during Nvidia’s hyper growth period in 2023 and 2024, there were quarterly reports that sent Nvidia skyrocketing on a runaway gap to new highs. Those gaps are never going to be filled. Because Nvidia was undervalued at that point and a fundamental shift put it on a new course.
Then you have breakaway gaps — where are a little different — a breakaway gap happens when a stock or index gaps-up above a key line of resistance or down below a key line of support. This happens all the time. For example, when the QQQ was at $500, I believe that’s how the QQQ ultimately ended up breaking out. Those gaps often do get filled.
Then you have exhaustion gaps that occur at the end of a long run. Where the market is clearly overbought/exhausted and there’s one last hurrah. We get a big gap-up after a long run and investors mistaken it for another runaway gap but it’s just exhaustion.
Every gap has a “upper gap-line” and a “lower gap-line” and they tend to represent a lot of support and resistance lines. That’s because below the upper gap-line you start to have a large number of people who lose their. Imagine anyone who bought ahead of the election for example. They’re still in the green if they’re long. But once the gap starts to get filled, they’re no longer green. This is often why gap lines often create a lot of support and resistance.
Support/Resistance lines aren’t all that difficult to spot and most investors are looking at the same exact things. Support and resistance lines are determined by prior trading.
For example, look at the Nvidia chart above. It’s clear that $144 plays a heavy support/resistance line for the stock. Why? Because every time Nvidia has gone north of $144, it has come under heavy selling pressure with $150 being the ultimate resistance line. Each time it touched $150, it sold right back down.
On the other side, Nvidia has strong support at $132. Note the number of times Nvidia visited $132 and then experienced a surge of buying interest. Even those days where it briefly fell under $132, look close at the chart. You can see nothing but heavy buying below that point. So even though Nvidia briefly fell to a low of $126, it was being bought up during that stage. Just like it was being sold above $144 and as it approached $150.
first of all I wish you a wonderful year 2025 Sam! nvidia is once again taking everyone on the wrong foot while we were waiting for support at $120.
obviously the stock violently went into overbought and we know that historically, in April, July, August, September and October the drop was significant when it was overbought. however its tendency to evolve against the current of QQQ challenges me just like the bubble forming on quantum…
I hear more and more analysts worried about the violence of the coming correction but I have been hearing this since 2022…
thank you for your lights Sam.
Best
Karl
Thoughts on META for Baratheon portfolio? Low PE, good AI outcomes and now several new republicans in the company’s management. Maybe there will be a TikTok headwind but don’t the fundamentals look a bit better than Apple?
At RSI=55 on the hourly and daily, META does not seem a good entry to me.
So Baratheon is purely a trading portfolio. We don’t really think a lot about the fundamentals when putting on trades there. Just looking at momentum and contrarian indicators.
So if we feel momentum in a stock is strong and likely pushing higher, we’ll buy. If we feel like a stock is oversold and ready to bounce, we’ll buy.
Meta doesn’t fit into either of those categories at present.
It’s neither overbought or oversold and doesn’t have particularly strong momentum at the moment.
Fundamentally it may be really strong, but that would be a reason for us to buy in our long-term portfolio like Lannister, Arryn, Tyrell and Tarly. Stark and Frey.
For those portfolios, we’re waiting for a correction to fully develop before going long. Meta may be a stock we buy. It’ll just depend on what type of opportunity there is in the stock once the market bottoms.
Thanks. Turned out to be a decent daytrade actually – 597 entry and 605 exit for Mar calls
Did Sam send out AAPL trade alert yet?
Just now
bought it
Sam – given the trade alerts and the relatively positive day for the indices, does this change your expectations for a correction mid January?
So in terms of “expectations” right now it’s a question of whether what we just saw (6% sell-off) counts as a correction from the market’s perspective. The QQQ pulled back from $538 down to $505. That’s about 6%. we’ve had small 6% corrections before, but that’s at the extreme low-end of the curve.
If the market doesn’t really count that as a correction, then we should see a big sell-off by the end of January. It means we’re still in the same overall move up and we’re due.
NVDA making a run this morning—does that change when we might expect its next correction?
Take a look at today’s post.